patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Watchung Eyes Utility Windfall for Radio System

PSE&G payment could fund new radio systems for emergency responders.

 

Area emergency responders have a Dec. 31 deadline to convert their radio systems to a new frequency, and like many communities, Watchung Borough has been wondering where to get the money to pay for it. 

At the Sept. 13 Borough Council meeting, council members hit on a plan deemed a "no brainer": use a $66,000 payment coming from PSE&G as part of the utility's Reliability Project work being undertaken to pay for the radio system conversion.

Councilman Thomas Franklin said PSE&G stipulated the uses the money could be spent on, including "the purchase of equipment and supplemental police overtime, emergency response equipment and resources" and training for fire and emergency personnel.

"It's timed perfectly—we need to do this, it's a mandate for us to do this nd it came along at the right time," Franklin said. 

The payments include $50,000 for the stipulated expenses and an additional $16,000 for vegetation mediation costs, but which are not required to be used for the stipulated costs.

The borough has estimated as much as $80,000 will be required to convert the communications systems for police, fire and Rescue Squad to new frequencies. The change is part of a nearly-20 year old effort by the Federal Communication Commission to move emergency service transmissions to a 12.5 kHz frequency, from existing 25 kHz frequencies, to open more bandwidth for other uses, according to the FCC.

Mayor Gerald Mobus called the plan a "no brainer" and suggested the funds be divided between the three groups.  

Related Topics: Narrowbanding and watchung borough council

Patch_comments_icon

John Patten

1:49 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Diana—The "narrowbanding" concerns the bandwidth of the transmissions, not the frequency they are broadcast. From what I can tell from the FCC's statements, it affects the efficency of the broadcasting—but I'm no expert.

Reply

John Walters

7:44 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Someone is misinformed.The story just has bad information,but heck it was not like it was not well written. JP you are close.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

John Patten

7:59 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Please let me know where we've got any incorrect information—I'm happy to correct anything not correct.

Reply

Anthony Perrucci

9:50 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Now, this can be money well spent if apportioned properly. The question: How much of the 66K will be devoted to supplemental police overtime vs. the upgrading of the communications systems? Plain and simple, where is the greater need as it would figure that greater communications could possibly improve response time by all three divisions and reduce costs overall.
Somehow, infrastructure improvements become "step children" to labor cost and ultimately cost more than originally planned when implemented. Priorities must be set and audited before these funds evaporate.

Reply

Leave a comment